Once more into the breach…

Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more,
Or close the wall up with our English dead!
In peace there’s nothing so becomes a man
As modest stillness and humility;

But when the blast of war blows in our ears,
Then imitate the action of the tiger:
Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood.

Henry V (5.3.44-51) [ht: About.com]

Img_4996There are just some times when it’s better to keep my mouth shut. It started with a twitter post on "once saved, always saved" – innocuous enough, but I thought the twitterer was actually looking for responses. I replied, others chimed in, but not the original tweeter. That should’ve been my first omen, seeing that someone was posting a question just for the sake of posting, sending a link with no room for comment just for the sake of getting free web hits. But the back and forth twits, short 140-character statements, that ensued with others caused the rift that I’m feeling now. From my perspective, the impasse was mostly syntax and supposition – but increasingly, I think I was seen as the antagonist asking someone to move off their rock of faith.

That was Thursday, and on Friday I was left unconnected, unable to respond twitteringly to my friend after our conversation. In each making our respective stands, you could say, something cracked. The strand of whatever was holding the relationship together was severed – and I’ve got to say that there’s a deep sadness in me that something like this has happened again, that it’s had to happen once more. And that’s the thing. This isn’t meant to put down the other person here, because I don’t think this is a "wrong" thing – we need to be able to draw boundaries like that sometimes, and I’m okay with it. But isn’t there a better way sometimes, a path that leads to better relationship and understanding rather than cutting the cord? I really hope there’s a reconnect in the future. But from past experience, I know that’s a long shot unless something radical happens on the inside. The folks I’ve "cut cords with" have not come back, nor I to them, and I can’t help but feel that we ourselves and the world at large is the worse for it in some way.

"They will know you by our love one for another" means more than our cordial buddy-ness on Sunday mornings passing in the church foyer, or on discussion boards, or in the blogs and coffeeshops and Christian bookstores of our lives. It means giving the time and space – and, to be honest, it means earning the time and the space – in each other’s lives to make our stands, to seek understanding, to give the benefit of my doubt and look for a way for both of us to grow, not just prove myself "right".

In the end this time, once again I’m left with the feeling that I wasn’t worth the time or the heart to work out the differences. It wasn’t worth it to let me disagree agreeably, and it was better to cut ties altogether. Instead of opening ourselves to what might have been a better thing, I’m left alone to wonder what went wrong. And I still want to give that same benefit of the doubt that wasn’t afforded to me. It wasn’t a close friendship, wasn’t culturally or socially like making an enemy – but it feels like a rip nonetheless, because the possibility of a friendship growing over time now seems like such an improbability.

Sometimes I keep my mouth shut for the damage it can do. Sometimes my twittering brings destruction upon the world.


6 thoughts on “Once more into the breach…

  1. Renee Ann says:

    I don’t think you are talking about me, though I was the main “discusser.” I know you and I disagree a lot and I am happy to discuss or to not discuss… but, I nearly always respond. I do try to be nice, but I am “to the point.”
    As I’ve said to you before, please forgive me if I have not been courteous. (Or, let me know if I have sinned against you in another manner).
    Peace. 🙂

  2. Rick says:

    No no – and putting it out here looks like I want to sully someone’s reputation. It’s not that, and it’s not you 🙂 – it’s just that this has happened again, and each time I get a little more cautious, a little less extroverted, and clam up into my shell a little more. We close ourselves off from others, and like I typed above, I think we’re worse for it.
    So much of what I read in our American history is based on opposing sides growing towards a better common goal. That’s the way I think it plays out best, on blogs, in comments or in Twitterspace 140-chars at a time 🙂

  3. Renee Ann says:

    I remember now, you and I were discussing the definition of the gospel, not perseverance of the saints.
    Regarding your circle of friends, you be you. 🙂 Some prefer a tighter circle. Let them be them, but don’t take it as a personal offense. I am more like you in preferring interaction with a diverse group of people. Don’t wall yourself off just because others do. 🙂
    On an aside, I do believe in absolute truth, but absolute truth is not absolutely always apparent. If we all move toward truth we may find that is not necessarily half-way in the middle of each others opinions. And, while I like to pursue absolute truth, not everyone desires that pursuit. That is their choice. Of course, some things we will never know or at least not until we stand before the throne of God. Now I’m rambling. 🙂
    Peace 🙂

  4. Rick says:

    Out of the same cloth 🙂 – for me, the adjective “absolute” is unnecessary, and we’ll do well to work together towards figuring out truth as you said above. Thanks again.

  5. Todd says:

    Rick, I still love you, pal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s